Critical Overview of Screening Tools for Detecting Bipolar Disorders

Authors

  • Micaela Dines Seccion de Salud Mental, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Juan A. Fernández, C1425AGP Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina; Instituto de Neurociencia Cognitiva y Traslacional (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas - Fundación INECO - Universidad Favaloro), C1060AAF Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0155-327X
  • Carolina Hernandorena Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L3X4, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-4843
  • Veronica Grasso Centro Integral de Psicoterapias Contextuales (Fundación CIPCO), X5000KBB Córdoba, Argentina https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6992-3552
  • Gustavo Vazquez Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L3X4, Canada; International Consortium for Mood & Psychotic Disorder Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02478, USA; Departamento de Neurociencias, Universidad de Palermo, C1186AAN Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2918-3336

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62641/aep.v53i5.1924

Keywords:

bipolar disorders, diagnosis, screening instruments, sensitivity, specificity

Abstract

This overview aims to explore the key screening tools for detecting bipolar disorders (BDs): the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale (BSDS), Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32), and Rapid Mood Screener (RMS), while offering guidance to healthcare professionals in selecting the most appropriate tool for each clinical scenario. The MDQ is widely utilized due to its high specificity (0.90) for identifying Bipolar Disorder (BD) in psychiatric consultations, although it is more sensitive to bipolar I than bipolar II. The BSDS, designed to encompass a wider range of bipolar spectrum symptoms, exhibits a sensitivity of 0.70 and specificity of 0.89, which makes it a complementary tool to the MDQ. The HCL-32 concentrates on detecting hypomanic traits in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients, showing good sensitivity (80%) but lower specificity (51%). It is particularly effective for distinguishing BD from unipolar depression, although it cannot differentiate between Bipolar Disorder type I (BDI) and Bipolar Disorder type II (BDII). The RMS is a newer tool that quickly screens for manic symptoms and risk factors, boasting a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.80. Together, these screening instruments facilitate the early identification of BDs, though positive results should always be followed by a thorough clinical evaluation. Employing multiple tools simultaneously can improve diagnostic accuracy and more effectively capture the diverse presentations of BDs.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-05

How to Cite

Dines, Micaela, et al. “Critical Overview of Screening Tools for Detecting Bipolar Disorders”. Actas Españolas De Psiquiatría, vol. 53, no. 5, Oct. 2025, pp. 1122-30, doi:10.62641/aep.v53i5.1924.

Issue

Section

Review